Translate

Showing posts with label bridge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bridge. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

The Amazing Golden Gate Bridge.

The Golden Gate is one of the modern engineering wonders. Located in the liberal city of San Francisco, this marvelous bridge will amaze engineers and general public equally. 


San Francisco Bay is Alcatraz, the trams, Silicon Valley, sea lions at the pier 39, live music, homeless, Berkeley University, the Golden Gate Park, freedom…but above all, when we think about San Francisco there is one place that comes to our minds: the Golden Gate Bridge.

The bridge from the viewpoint located on San Francisco’s side. (Own picture)

Before the construction of the bridge, the only route between San Francisco and Marin County was by ferry. The population growth in the Bay area made necessary a permanent link, but many said it was impossible to build due to the weather conditions (strong winds and dense fogs) and geography (6,700 ft-2,042 m strait, and 372 ft-113 m water depth at the center of the channel).

Design: The designated Chief Engineer for the Golden Gate Bridge was Joseph Strauss, a bridge designer from Chicago, who had developed his career with movable bridges, until he moved to California. Despite his experience in trunnion bascule bridges, he did not have relevant experience in suspension bridges. His first design was a hybrid cantilever and suspension structure, so grotesque that everybody rejected it and agreed to find a more esthetic solution. The Consulting Engineer Leon S. Moisseiff proposed a suspension bridge without cantilever, with a span never tried before for that type. Nowadays, we know that another Engineer named Charles Alton Ellis performed the checking calculations and the corrections that ensured the durability of the bridge. Strauss dismissed Ellis fearing that his name could be eclipsed. Today a small plaque recognizes Ellis as a big contributor to the bridge conception, but he died without all the honors he deserved.

Strauss’ bizarre first design (http://www.historicbridges.org/)

Art Deco: The designs of Strauss had an inelegant mechanical look, and after the rejection of his first proposition he realized that the bridge would be a fusion of functionality, economy, form and beauty. Finally, the consulting architect Irving Foster Morrow was entrusted with the project. We owe him the sleek, simple, modern towers, and the elegant curve of cables. He simplified the bridge lines, so our eyes go to the clean towers and cables, instead of the old-fashioned truss structure.

Color: At the first the Navy wanted the bridge to be painted with black and yellow stripes to ensure visibility in the foggy bay, but fortunately Morrow convinced them and chose the characteristic orange vermillion called international orange.

Golden Gate Bridge Structures (http://goldengatebridge.org)

The GGB view from Baker Beach. (Own picture)

View of the Golden Gate from the central yard of Alcatraz prison, as a constant reminder of the wonder of free life. (Own picture)

There is a viewpoint on the San Francisco side which you can reach by public bus or even go driving and park your car there. Click on the link for further info.

Facts:
Location: San Francisco, California.
Cost: $35 million (around $1.2 billion today).
Construction time: 4 years, 4 months and 23 days.
Opening date: May 27, 1937.

The Bridge:
Total length: 1.7 miles (8,981 ft or 2,737 m).
Length of suspended span (distance between towers): 4,200 ft (1,280 m).
Width of Bridge is 90 ft (27 m).
Clearance above mean higher high water: 220 ft (67 m).
Steel rivets: 1.2 million.

Main Tower:
The Golden Gate Bridge has two main towers that support the two main cables.
Height of a tower above water: 746 ft (227 m).

Main Cable Stats:
Diameter of one main cable including the exterior wrapping: 36 3/8 in (0.92 m).
Length of one main cable: 7,650 ft (2,332 m).
Weight of main cables, suspender cables, and accessories: 24,500 tons.

More info:
Find more pictures and info here:  
Other sources:

http://goldengatebridge.org/research/documents/art_deco_GGB.pdf

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Copenhagen-Hamburg: A delightful trip in the train-ship.

If you live in Copenhagen, a nice weekend trip is going to Hamburg. Probably the easiest way to go is by train. A peaceful four hours and a half trip in a comfortable brand new train. But this journey holds a surprise.



Conpenhagen-Hamburg. This 331 km journey takes 4 hours and a half by train. 
Return tickets from 83€/person.

We thought that the train would go west through bridges that connect the island of Copenhagen (Zealand) and Funen with Jutland peninsula, and then go south crossing the border to Germany. But we took South direction; we left Zealand Island to Lolland Island crossing by bridge. Once arrived to Rodbyhavn town, the whole train went into a big Ferry. The floor of the ferry is prepared with grooved rails, so the train went directly from onshore to the ship. If you are asleep you will not notice that you cross the sea in a train, which is as well in a ferry.

Train inside the Ferry.

The Ferry also carries cars, buses and trucks. When the train arrives, all the other vehicles are already on board, what is necessary to meet the schedule.
Once inside the boat, a gentle woman advice you through the speakers to get out from the train and go for a walk on the boat deck, restaurant, supermarket, etc. We did, but some of the passengers stood in the train, sleeping or reading.

The transit in the Ferry took 60 minutes, but time flies while you explore the Ferry and buy something in the shop. Then people returned to the train, which disembarked in Puttgarden (Germany), and went to Hamburg, previous one stop in Lübeck. We got out in Hamburg, but this train finishes the journey in Berlin.

Great experience in our Hamburg weekend, probably it is the funniest city in the north of Germany. It was a pitty that we went there after the football season, and we could not see the atmosphere at St Pauli’s Stadium, but we definitely had a nice surprise with this sailor train we had never heard about.

Investigating more about this Ferry, I discovered an interesting project to replace the boat connection by a bridge or a tunnel. After discussion, the Danish Parliament voted to construct a tunnel for these reasons: lower visual impact, it does not interference with maritime navigation and birds’ migration, and above all, it can be used in adverse meteorological conditions. This votation was in 2011, but high cost of a 19 km tunnel, the potential loss of jobs both in Rodbyen and Puttgarden, and economic crisis, seems to be the reasons for the actual paralysis of the project.

Let see if both Danish and German government will invest such a huge amount of money in this project after the economic crisis; but in my opinion, it is a charming, surprising and original trip in the way it is nowadays, as the “maritime train”.

More info:

Tunnel or bridge? Economic impact. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gF6NRWda1Lk